» Sunday, September 5, 2010 index page   |  home page   
The Newsletter for Industrial Users of Saccharomyces
Welcome to YeastBytes
Like a five year old who has just been refused those must have black chunky shoes, here we are kicking and screaming with YeastBytes no.4. Despite the unrelenting pressure, we have stuck to our task to deliver a late summer bumper edition with some more finely honed pieces in our bimonthly homage to all things Saccharomyces.
The lead article in this issue is something of a party political broadcast on behalf of the 'Yeast Supply' party, often seen as failing to punch its weight and grabbing too few votes. This piece focuses on the benefits of yeast supply or management through the eyes of a 'party worker'. Unable to resist the pun, 'freeze dying' hits home on the perils of using dried yeast from commercial collections for yeast supply. For the first time in YeastBytes' young life we take a deep breath and consider the thorny subject of the 'generation game' and the pros and cons of culling and replacing yeast. Next up Cara new boy, Pieter Swanepoel introduces ('passport control') some of the amazing developments in molecular methods that have made strain fingerprinting a quick and cost-effective monitoring tool. YeastBytes regular Chris Giles mulls over the joys of the QA of microbiological media. Finally, in the bizarre corner that is 'did you know?', YeastBytes catches up on the spread of Australian yeast extract in art!
In this issue:
» supplying the benefits
» freeze dying
» passport control
» the generation game
» how does your media grow?
» when you run out of paint ...
freeze dying
I have a lot of affection for BRI (aka Brewing Research International). I'm part of a small group of folk who have worked at Nutfield on two occasions - as far as I know nobody has managed three stints! My first appearance in the early 1970's - at what was then BIRF (a snappy acronym for the 'Brewing Industry Research Foundation') - was characterised by black and white photographs of surprisingly well dressed people. In my case, a jacket, trousers and tie was the everyday dress code, as was dark luxuriant hair and a 32 inch waist - oh halcyon days! This was the time when 'best practice' was that precious production yeast strains were freeze dried prior to storage in the National Collection of Yeast Cultures (NCYC) held at that time at BIRF.
Well, of course the world moves on. BIRF has become BRI, the NCYC has moved to the Institute of Food Research in Norwich, my waist measurement and hair colour have become a source of disappointment (!) and freeze drying of stock cultures of yeast strains has been replaced by 'liquid nitrogen' as 'best practice' for yeast supply.
Keen readers will recognise 'liquid nitrogen' as having a good press in YeastBytes. Having featured in our first issue ('why yeast supply matters'), second issue ('cryopreservation - stayin' alive') and no.3 ('the challenge of zero defects'). So no surprises to find it here and to repeat its glowing school report by describing it (once more) as the creme de la creme of living cell preservation. Quite simply - performed correctly, viability and genetic stability are not compromised by storage in liquid nitrogen. As noted elswhere in YeastBytes no.4, indeed the bees' knees!
Freeze drying or lyophilisation of brewing yeast master cultures is now accepted by most as bad news. The evidence is not new. Barbara Kirsop at BIRF/BRI showed in 1955 (yes - really, more than 50 years ago) that the average viability for 29 strains of S. cerevisiae was a mere 4.3% two days after drying. On revisiting the work in 1991 she warmed to her theme in demonstrating that the average viability for freeze dried cultures of the genus Saccharomyces at the NCYC was 5%. Further in 1981, the redoubtable pairing of Inge Russell and Graham Stewart showed that freeze drying killed five of the eleven brewing strains they studied. Of those that survived, some exhibited changes in flocculence and increased frequency of the mitochondrial ('petite') mutation. If this is not enough, a more recent(ish) report in 1996 showed chromosomal breaks in yeast ex freeze drying.
So, as they first said in the mid 1800's, "you pays your money and takes your choice". If I was you and I wanted a consistent, robust yeast supply process I wouldn't let master cultures of freeze dried yeast anywhere near my brewery. I would opt for my yeast to be stored in (and supplied from) liquid nitrogen every time. Not, you'll understand, that I'm biased!
David Quain
 ... printable version »
?....back
We hope that you found this issue of YeastBytes useful. If you know of a colleague who might like to receive it, feel free to forward it to them and suggest they subscribe. We welcome your comments and suggestions about YeastBytes.
Email us at: yeastbytes@cara-online.com
YeastBytes is published by Cara Technology Limited, a company committed to better brewery problem management.
Company number: 2242098 VAT number: GB 492 3199 23. Cara Technology Limited, Randalls Road, Leatherhead, Surrey KT22 7RY, UK
All rights reserved. Copyright 2007 Cara Technology Limited.